Vol. 8 No. 1-3: September/October 2000: Special edition on the Supreme Court's 1999 constitutional cases

Published: 2000-10-31

Full Issue

Article

  • The Charter dialogue between courts and legislatures

    Peter W. Hogg, Allison A. Thornton
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/sfvwtz34

  • Judicial review in an age of legal realism: The debate over judicial activism

    F.L. Morton
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/g9dcqg26

  • The Supreme Court of Canada in 1999: The year in review

    Patrick J. Monahan
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/a08pgg98

  • The judicial role in a democratic state

    Rosalie Silberman Abella
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/p0exdn21

  • Judicial activism and the Constitution

    Guy W. Giorno
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/knwxgs81

  • The Supreme Court’s new equality test: A critique

    Christopher D. Bredt, Ira Nishisato
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/pd5qyw75

  • A mirage or an oasis? Giving substance to substantive equality

    Martha McCarthy, Joanne Radbord
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/qbd3vd48

  • Defence under attack: A review of three important Supreme Court decisions in 1999

    Leslie Pringle
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/znkr8253

  • Shifting ground: New approaches to Charter analysis in the criminal context

    Renee M. Pomerance
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/hdveps73

  • Treaty rights, the Indian Act, and the Canadian Constitution: The Supreme Court’s 1999 decisions

    Kent McNeil
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/fbcf0148

  • The Marshall decision as seen by an “expert witness”

    Stephen Patterson
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/ctk5ga98

  • The importance of the Marshall decision

    Tom Flanagan
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/97vj1q52