Vol. 8 No. 1-3: September/October 2000: Special edition on the Supreme Court's 1999 constitutional cases

Published: 2000-10-31

Full Issue

Article

  • The Charter dialogue between courts and legislatures

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/sfvwtz34
    Peter W. Hogg, Allison A. Thornton

  • Judicial review in an age of legal realism: The debate over judicial activism

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/g9dcqg26
    F.L. Morton

  • The Supreme Court of Canada in 1999: The year in review

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/a08pgg98
    Patrick J. Monahan

  • The judicial role in a democratic state

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/p0exdn21
    Rosalie Silberman Abella

  • Judicial activism and the Constitution

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/knwxgs81
    Guy W. Giorno

  • The Supreme Court’s new equality test: A critique

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/pd5qyw75
    Christopher D. Bredt, Ira Nishisato

  • A mirage or an oasis? Giving substance to substantive equality

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/qbd3vd48
    Martha McCarthy, Joanne Radbord

  • Defence under attack: A review of three important Supreme Court decisions in 1999

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/znkr8253
    Leslie Pringle

  • Shifting ground: New approaches to Charter analysis in the criminal context

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/hdveps73
    Renee M. Pomerance

  • Treaty rights, the Indian Act, and the Canadian Constitution: The Supreme Court’s 1999 decisions

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/fbcf0148
    Kent McNeil

  • The Marshall decision as seen by an “expert witness”

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/ctk5ga98
    Stephen Patterson

  • The importance of the Marshall decision

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.25071/97vj1q52
    Tom Flanagan