(Re)negotiating treaties: Navigating within and between settler-Anishinaabe legal landscapes

Auteurs-es

  • Samantha D. Stevens

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.25071/p80szg93

Biographie de l'auteur-e

  • Samantha D. Stevens

    Samantha D. Stevens is a PhD candidate at Carleton University’s School of Indigenous and Canadian Studies and Institute of Political Economy. As a British-Canadian settler who has been welcomed into Nipissing First Nation through marriage, Samantha focuses her work on decolonization and the responsibilities of settlers as guests on these lands. Her SSHRC-funded PhD research investigates  crosscultural legal understandings related to Restoule v. Canada by using an interdisciplinary and  community-informed collaborative approach.

Références

Bohaker, H. (2020). Doodem and the council fire: Anishinaabe governance through alliance. University of Toronto Press.

Borrows, J. (2010). Drawing out law: A spirit’s guide. University of Toronto Press.

Christie, G. (2000). Justifying principles of treaty interpretation. Queen’s Law Journal, 26(1), 143 – 224.

Craft, A. (2017). Broken trust: Finding our way out of the damaged relationship through the rebuilding of Indigenous legal institutions. In Law Society of Upper Canada, Special lectures 2017: Canada at 150: The Charter and the Constitution (pp. 379 – 393). Law Society of Upper Canada.

Gray, C., & King, H. (Eds.). (2022). A special report: Treaty interpretation in the age of Restoule. Yellowhead Institute.

Jung, C. (2018). Reconciliation: Six reasons to worry. Journal of Global Ethics, 14(2), 252 – 265.

Pratt, M. L. (2008). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General). (2018). 2018 ONSC 7701.

Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General). (2020). 2020 ONSC 3932.

Restoule v. Canada (Attorney General). (2022). 2022 ONSC 7368.

Stark, H. (2017). Stories as law. A method to live by. In C. Andersen & J. M. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources and methods in Indigenous studies (pp. 249 – 256). Routledge.

Wilson, S., & Hughes, M. (2019). Why research is reconciliation. In S. Wilson, A. Breen, & L. DuPré (Eds.), Research and reconciliation: Unsettling ways of knowing through Indigenous relationships. Canadian Scholars.

Wyile, H. (2019). “The currency that is reconciliation discourse in Canada”: Contesting neoliberal reconciliation. Studies in Canadian Literature, 43(2), 121 – 143. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/SCL/article/view/29294

Téléchargements

Publié

2023-04-01

Numéro

Spring 2023: (Re)studying, (re)imagining, (re)presenting Canada through fatigue and hope

Rubrique

Article

Licence

Bien que le Centre Robarts détienne les droits d'auteur de tous les numéros et documents éditoriaux de Canada Watch, les droits de chaque pièce appartiennent à l'auteur (actuellement sous licence Creative Commons). Ceci à été la pratique du Centre depuis 1992.

Comment citer

(Re)negotiating treaties: Navigating within and between settler-Anishinaabe legal landscapes. (2023). Canada Watch. https://doi.org/10.25071/p80szg93